Liv. 9,43, 22-24

 

Editor: F.Russo

Text:

Hernicorum tribus populis, Aletrinati Verulano Ferentinati, quia maluerunt quam civitatem, suae leges redditae conubiumque inter ipsos, quod aliquamdiu soli Hernicorum habuerunt, permissum. Anagninis quique arma Romanis intulerant civitas sine suffragii latione data: concilia conubiaque adempta et magistratibus praeter quam sacrorum curatione interdictum.
(Weissenborn – Müller 1894)

Translation: “Three of the Hernican people – those of Aletrium, Verulae, and Ferentinum – were left with their laws, as they preferred that to the Roman citizenship, and the right of intermarriage with each other, a privilege which for a considerable period they were the only communities amongst the Hernicans to enjoy. The Anagnians and the others who had taken up arms against Rome were granted the citizenship without the right of vote; they were deprived of their assemblies and of the right of intermarriage with each other, and their magistrates were forbidden to exercise any functions except those connected with religion.” (F.Russo)

Dating: 305 BC (GRUEN 1986)

Bibliography: W.Weissenborn – H.J.Müller, Titi Livi ab urbe condita libri. Libri VIII-XXIII, Lipsiae 1894; J.WEISS, s.v. Hernici, in: RE VIII 1, 1912, col. 906; A.Bernardi, I cives sine suffragio, Athenaeum 16, 1938, 239-277; E.MANNI, Per la storia dei municipi fino alla guerra sociale, Roma 1947, 29-32; M.Sordi, I rapporti romano-ceriti e l’origine della civitas sine suffragio, Roma 1960, 46-47; A.N.SHERWIN-WHITE, The Roman Citinzenship, Oxford 1973², 47-50; M.Humbert, Municipium et civitas sine suffragio. L’organisation de la conquête jusqu’à la guerre sociale, Roma 1978, 216-219; E.S.GRUEN, The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome, vol. 1, Berkeley 1984, 143; G.Colonna – S.Gatti, Graffiti arcaici dai santuari degli Ernici, Archeologia Laziale 10, 1990, 241-247; G.Colonna, Appunti su Ernici e Volsci, in: Nomen Latinum. Latini e Romani prima di Annibale, II, Genesi e struttura del Lazio antico, Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Roma, Accademia di S.Luca 24-26 ottobre 1995, Eutopia 4. 2, 1995[1997], 3-20; L.CAPPELLETTI, Il ruolo dei fetiales e il concetto di civitas in Liv. 9, 45, 5-9, Tyche 12, 1997, 7-13, 8; W.BROADHEAD, Rome’s migration policy and the so-called ius migrandi, CCG 12, 2001, 69-89, 75-76, 82; C.FAYER, La familia romana. Aspetti giuridici e antiquari. Sponsalia matrimonio dote, Roma 2005, 403; S.P.Oakley, A Commentary on Livy. Books VI-X, Vol. 3, Oxford 2005, 565-567; H.MOURITSEN, The Civitas Sine Suffragio: Ancient Concepts and Modern Ideology, Historia 56, 2007, 141-158, 154; C.Ferrante – S.Gatti – V.Fiocchi Nicolai (eds.), Fana, Templa, Delubra, Corpus dei luoghi di culto dell’Italia antica (FDT), 1. Regio I: Alatri, Anagni, Capitulum Hernicum, Ferentino, Veroli, Roma 2008, 2; S.T.ROSELAAR, Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of Ager Publicus in Italy, 396-89 BC, Oxford 2010, 32-37; S.GATTI, Compitum Anagninum, in: G.Ghini (ed.), Lazio e Sabina 7, Atti del Convegno, Settimo Incontro di Studi sul Lazio e la Sabina, Roma 9-11 marzo 2010, Roma 2011, 411-424, 422; S.T.ROSELAAR, Colonies and processes of integration in the Roman Republic, MEFRA 123, 2011, 527-555; S.T.ROSELAAR, The concept of commercium in the Roman Republic, Phoenix 66, 2012, 381-413, 388; S.T.ROSELAAR, The Concept of Conubium in the Roman Republic, in: P.J.Du Plessis (ed.), New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World, Edinburgh 2013, 102-122, 109; C.ANDO, Pluralisme juridique et intégration de l’empire, in: G.de Kleijn – S.Benoist (eds.), Integration in Rome and in the Roman World, Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire, Lille, June 23-25, 2011, Leiden 2014, 5-19, 7; M.Tarpin, Strangers in Paradise. Latins (and some other non-Romans) in colonial context: a short story of territorial complexity, in: T.D.Stek – J.Pelgrom (eds.), Roman Republican Colonization New Perspectives from Archaeology and Ancient History, Roma 2014, 160-191, 162.